FROM THE BLOG
Perhaps you have heard of the term “caps” in describing medical malpractice cases in Florida. At one point in time, Florida imposed a ceiling on the financial award you could recover from a medical malpractice case for yours or your loved one’s pain and suffering. This ceiling was known as a cap, and it carried a specific dollar amount, depending on the type of injury and defendant. However, its exact meaning has become unclear due to recent court decisions. In Florida, there is no longer a cap on pain and suffering damages in medical malpractice cases that result in death. For personal injury cases originating from medical malpractice, the legal trend is that the cap has been found unconstitutional as well.
In 2002, to address the impact of “skyrocketing” liability insurance premiums on healthcare in Florida, Governor Jeb Bush created the Governor’s Select Task Force on Healthcare Professional Liability Insurance. The Task Force declared that a medical malpractice insurance crisis existed, and that access to quality healthcare would be compromised if physicians could not afford insurance and were forced to practice outside the state. The Legislature used this premise to craft caps on noneconomic damages for medical malpractice cases, in an attempt to control the escalation of the purported, impending crisis. Under the cap structure, pain and suffering as a result of medical malpractice could only be worth so much.
The caps applied for approximately ten years until they were declared unconstitutional in the Florida Supreme Court case of Estate of McCall v. U.S., 134 So.3d 894 (Fla. 2014). The Court found that these caps violated a citizen’s constitutional right to equal protection. Because the cap applied regardless of the number of claimants, it was poised to arbitrarily diminish compensation for cases in which there were multiple victims. The McCall Court also found that the cap did not bear a rational relationship to the purported medical malpractice insurance crisis in Florida. In fact, the Court called the Task Force’s finding of a “medical malpractice crisis” to be dubious and questionable.
The McCall holding was specifically limited to wrongful death cases. The question remained open as to whether the caps were unconstitutional in the context of personal injury cases arising from medical malpractice. Now, this question is not as open as it had been in 2014, post-McCall. Since McCall, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has twice declared that the medical malpractice caps are unconstitutional in personal injury cases as well. In North Broward Hospital District v. Kalitan, 174 So.3d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), the court was persuaded by McCall and found that caps on noneconomic damages in personal injury cases arising from medical malpractice likewise violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Florida Constitution. Similarly, in Go v. Normil, 184 So.3d 554 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), the Fourth District Court of Appeal declared again that the caps were unconstitutional in the context of personal injury.
In short, the monetary amount of your pain and suffering will not be limited by statute in the context of wrongful death; the caps no longer exists. The caps that currently exist for
personal injury have been challenged and are susceptible to being chiseled away under the reasoning the Florida Supreme Court adopted in the McCall case. To have your case thoroughly evaluated by an experienced medical malpractice attorney, please contact The Patient’s Law Firm to speak directly with nurse attorney Christa Carpenter.